CASE LAW AIR 1964 KER 277 - AN OVERVIEW

case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview

case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview

Blog Article

We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

Case regulation is specific to your jurisdiction in which it absolutely was rendered. By way of example, a ruling in the California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.

Since the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been arrived at, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only done if the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence as well as the petitioner company responded into the allegations as such they were nicely aware of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to become appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

This is because transfer orders are typically regarded within the administrative discretion in the employer. However, there could be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more

145 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement while in the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were advised from the boy’s past, they requested if their children were safe with him in their home. The therapist certain them that they had absolutely nothing to worry about.

We are an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of legislation and also to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed with the Constitution and laws on the United States and this State.

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling about the same type of case.

Have you been looking for Court Information? You may use our site to search to get a case or search for a person. Information check here about the site is updated every 24 hours at 3:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found over the search site is provided to be used as reference material and is not the official court record.

12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair on the offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.

The different roles of case regulation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in just how that courts render decisions. Common law courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale driving their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and infrequently interpret the wider legal principles.

171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is properly founded now that the provision for proforma promotion just isn't alien or unfamiliar to the civil servant service construction but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it is actually lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may possibly if satisfied that a civil servant who was entitled to become promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his personal, wrongfully prevented from rendering service for the Federation/ province during the higher post, direct that these kinds of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay and allowances of these kinds of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more

Summaries give a condensed overview of offences and their penalties, and the procedural aspects of prosecuting and punishing individuals accused of committing crimes.

Report this page